By Jim Lyde
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Operating Officer
MEET THE PRESS, Sunday, September 7, 2008.
Q. (General Bill Gann, USAF retired) – [to Senator Obama] – “Why do you not follow protocol [placing your hand over your heart in the presence of the American flag] or at least stand and face it?”
A. (Senator Barack Obama) – “As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides…” “There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression…” “The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing.” The National Anthem should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing.’ If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as “redesign” our flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. IT’S MY INTENTION, IF ELECTED, TO DISARM AMERICA TO THE LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE TO OUR MIDDLE EAST BRETHREN. IF WE, AS A NATION OF WARRING PEOPLE, CONDUCT OURSELVES LIKE THE NATIONS OF ISLAM, WHERE PEACE PREVAILS – PERHAPS A STATE OR PERIOD OF MUTUAL ACCORD COULD EXIST BETWEEN OUR GOVERNMENTS…”
Q. (General Bill Gann, USAF retired) – [to Senator Obama] – “Why do you not follow protocol [placing your hand over your heart in the presence of the American flag] or at least stand and face it?”
A. (Senator Barack Obama) – “As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides…” “There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression…” “The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing.” The National Anthem should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing.’ If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as “redesign” our flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. IT’S MY INTENTION, IF ELECTED, TO DISARM AMERICA TO THE LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE TO OUR MIDDLE EAST BRETHREN. IF WE, AS A NATION OF WARRING PEOPLE, CONDUCT OURSELVES LIKE THE NATIONS OF ISLAM, WHERE PEACE PREVAILS – PERHAPS A STATE OR PERIOD OF MUTUAL ACCORD COULD EXIST BETWEEN OUR GOVERNMENTS…”
How's that for an intro? Presently, President Obama and Attorney General Holder are implementing a national program to federalize local police departments. We previously have been warned that the DOJ’s findings of racism within the Ferguson, Missouri, Police Department were a ruse that would lead to something like this. The first six departments in this program include the Ft. Worth TEXAS Police Department. How is this possible? Note this from the Tea Party Network: " The Administration has carefully chosen six “pilot” cities in dire need of cash with mayors and police chiefs willing to sell their city’s local rule in exchange for short-term financial gains. All but one, Fort Worth, are majority Democrat-run cities. All have high black, Latino, or Muslim populations, amongst which an open door policy encouraging claims of discrimination will be greeted with much enthusiasm."
Lawsuits surely will be coming but that is woefully insufficient. During the 2012 election cycle, some European outfit was presuming to monitor statewide elections in Texas. Attorney General Greg Abbott did not get upset; he just mentioned that anyone within 100 feet of a polling place in Texas is subject to arrest. That ended that little problem. Well, this one is not so little! We should expect a prompt and defiant response from the Texas government and physical intervention if necessary.
Perhaps you imagine a Texas bias. Folks, this is getting serious! Previous TLC articles have envisioned the possibility that our President may be working hard to create a societal situation in America that would give him an excuse to declare martial law [see Martial Law and Constitutional Limitations as well as Martial Law and Domestic Disorder]. We need to remind ourselves that the Constitution under martial law [Presidential Power and Martial Law] would be basically moot. Following martial law could be the suspension of elections. Then Congress could begin the process of becoming irrelevant. The Supreme Court would simply be ignored. Obama has repeatedly acted as if these situations are in place now.
It would be surprising if the State of Texas cooperated in any way with this most recent trashing of the 10th Amendment. But what if confrontation is the objective? Can’t you hear the President decrying the damage and suffering associated with racial violence? Earnest attempts to address this dilemma by federalizing racist police departments have been met with resistance, even force. We are perilously ignoring the threat of climate change. The Affordable Care Act, an effort to raise up the downtrodden, is plagued by threats from Republicans, potential unfavorable rulings from the Supreme Court and the misguided opposition of the proletariat, uh, the people. Obama’s brilliant foreign policy initiatives have been sabotaged by Republicans by questioning the historic integrity of exalted Iran. Martial law is the only thing that will save the country, even the whole world. Along with Benjamin Netanyahu, George W. Bush remains the primary cause of it all. That unimaginable scenario is beginning to seem more and more realistic, isn’t it?
What is Obama? The indisputable facts are:
1. Both his father and step-father were Muslims.
2. Obama was raised as a child in Indonesia as a Muslim.
3. Obama’s mentor during his later youth in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis, a communist.
4. He was married in, and for many years attended Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ. The pastor of that church, Jeremiah Wright is a leading proponent of Black Liberation Theology which was founded by James Cone who was also a Communist. James Cone wrote that blacks could not be liberated in a capitalistic society.
All this and much more was known prior to Obama’s election as president. The President has enjoyed the mindless adoration of pseudo-intellectual liberals in academia, the mainstream media, the entertainment industry, race-baiting charlatans and all others that could be persuaded. Even from the right he has been judged with a false measure of culpability. Conservatives had tended to respond to Obama’s lying, cover-ups and stonewalling by giving him a counterfeit benefit of doubt. Obama’s obstinacy and deceptiveness have been rewarded by the idea that the charges against him have not been proven, that we don’t have the facts. TLC suggests that instead of applying “rules of evidence” similar to that of criminal courts, it is appropriate to incorporate similar rules utilized in civil courts. Rather than “beyond reasonable doubt,” the standard should be “preponderance [weight] of the evidence.” If the people applied that standard to the occurrences within his presidency, Obama would be in trouble, as he deserves to be.
There are too many rehashed arguments in this article, so we will list no more. How many times does he lie before he is called a liar? How much evidence is hidden before he is charged with being an obstructionist? How many times does he brazenly act contrary to the Constitution before it is realized that he is attacking this great society? When do we forcefully answer the question, “What is Obama?”
Lawsuits surely will be coming but that is woefully insufficient. During the 2012 election cycle, some European outfit was presuming to monitor statewide elections in Texas. Attorney General Greg Abbott did not get upset; he just mentioned that anyone within 100 feet of a polling place in Texas is subject to arrest. That ended that little problem. Well, this one is not so little! We should expect a prompt and defiant response from the Texas government and physical intervention if necessary.
Perhaps you imagine a Texas bias. Folks, this is getting serious! Previous TLC articles have envisioned the possibility that our President may be working hard to create a societal situation in America that would give him an excuse to declare martial law [see Martial Law and Constitutional Limitations as well as Martial Law and Domestic Disorder]. We need to remind ourselves that the Constitution under martial law [Presidential Power and Martial Law] would be basically moot. Following martial law could be the suspension of elections. Then Congress could begin the process of becoming irrelevant. The Supreme Court would simply be ignored. Obama has repeatedly acted as if these situations are in place now.
It would be surprising if the State of Texas cooperated in any way with this most recent trashing of the 10th Amendment. But what if confrontation is the objective? Can’t you hear the President decrying the damage and suffering associated with racial violence? Earnest attempts to address this dilemma by federalizing racist police departments have been met with resistance, even force. We are perilously ignoring the threat of climate change. The Affordable Care Act, an effort to raise up the downtrodden, is plagued by threats from Republicans, potential unfavorable rulings from the Supreme Court and the misguided opposition of the proletariat, uh, the people. Obama’s brilliant foreign policy initiatives have been sabotaged by Republicans by questioning the historic integrity of exalted Iran. Martial law is the only thing that will save the country, even the whole world. Along with Benjamin Netanyahu, George W. Bush remains the primary cause of it all. That unimaginable scenario is beginning to seem more and more realistic, isn’t it?
What is Obama? The indisputable facts are:
1. Both his father and step-father were Muslims.
2. Obama was raised as a child in Indonesia as a Muslim.
3. Obama’s mentor during his later youth in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis, a communist.
4. He was married in, and for many years attended Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ. The pastor of that church, Jeremiah Wright is a leading proponent of Black Liberation Theology which was founded by James Cone who was also a Communist. James Cone wrote that blacks could not be liberated in a capitalistic society.
All this and much more was known prior to Obama’s election as president. The President has enjoyed the mindless adoration of pseudo-intellectual liberals in academia, the mainstream media, the entertainment industry, race-baiting charlatans and all others that could be persuaded. Even from the right he has been judged with a false measure of culpability. Conservatives had tended to respond to Obama’s lying, cover-ups and stonewalling by giving him a counterfeit benefit of doubt. Obama’s obstinacy and deceptiveness have been rewarded by the idea that the charges against him have not been proven, that we don’t have the facts. TLC suggests that instead of applying “rules of evidence” similar to that of criminal courts, it is appropriate to incorporate similar rules utilized in civil courts. Rather than “beyond reasonable doubt,” the standard should be “preponderance [weight] of the evidence.” If the people applied that standard to the occurrences within his presidency, Obama would be in trouble, as he deserves to be.
There are too many rehashed arguments in this article, so we will list no more. How many times does he lie before he is called a liar? How much evidence is hidden before he is charged with being an obstructionist? How many times does he brazenly act contrary to the Constitution before it is realized that he is attacking this great society? When do we forcefully answer the question, “What is Obama?”
RSS Feed